Digital Risk: Enterprises Need More Than Cyber Insurance
Threatonomics

Translating Cyber Risk into Financial Solutions

Having a Quantified Cyber Action Plan

by Travis Wong
Published

Translating the significance of cyber risk to key stakeholders can be challenging.

As security professionals, you understand potential threats, vulnerabilities, and the value of robust security measures. However, conveying this information in terms that resonate with financial decision-makers can feel like trying to communicate in different languages.

To get the necessary budget approvals and support, security experts need to express the impact of risk and mitigations in financial terms. Through Resilience’s Quantified Cyber Action Plan (QCAP), clients can build and implement a financially measurable security plan that considers stakeholder investment and executive-level buy-in by assigning a monetary value to cybersecurity risks.

Translating Risk into Actionable Insight 

Security today suffers from communications challenges due to the technical complexity of defending against cyber threats. CISOs speak in terms of malware and vulnerabilities, whereas CFOs and risk managers deal with dollars and probabilities. Building effective cyber resilience depends on connecting these two silos of leadership to invest efficiently against your cyber risk.

Most cybersecurity solutions today only offer generic “best practices” to tackle cyber risks that ignore the financial implications of a business’s operational goals. While it would be a dream to purchase every security product that controls any incident in perpetuity, the financial reality of purchasing security necessitates controlling those incidents that are most likely to cause financial loss. But how can organizations tell what investments will provide the highest return on investment?

Resilience’s 2022 claims report demonstrated that while phishing (a long-time top security control) remains a primary “point of failure” leading to financial loss, the risk from third-party vendors is just as important. While both of these issues appear to be top priorities, the Resilience QCAP helps customers prioritize their security program investments based on probable financial loss from incidents most relevant to their business.

Extracting data from our AI platform, we present this analysis as a peril-based investment plan that is based on our client’s unique risk profiles and Resilience’s proprietary cyber risk quantification models. The QCAP generates graphs and charts, such as our loss exceedance curve, that help express our client’s probability of exceeding losses beyond a given amount. These visuals calculate the chances of an event and put the client’s risk in terms of dollars and cents that fluctuate depending on the installation of various controls.

Justifying a Budget through the QCAP 

The QCAP helps our clients link their current or planned security controls to their projected Return on Investment (ROI). This process uncovers which measures will yield the most significant impact while minimizing expenses. “When an organization can understand the benefit of certain tools in terms of dollars and cents, making investment decisions becomes easier,” said Travis Wong, VP of Customer Engagement at Resilience. “Our QCAP is tailored to help risk management, cybersecurity, and financial leadership align on strategic objectives and detail the steps required to meet these objectives.”

The tools, capabilities, and data offered through the QCAP translate cybersecurity professionals’ needs into actionable steps, helping build budgets that are informed by the predicted cost of risk. This measurement allows security leaders to communicate informed decisions to stakeholders in financial terms. Sharing a common language helps security information and financial leaders understand each other’s goals and align on strategic objectives to meet them.

Improved Risk Posture for Better Coverage

Traditionally, risk transfer, mitigation, and acceptance solutions don’t communicate, which can lead to gaps in an organization’s security. By bridging these silos, Resilience helps our clients leverage the improvements made to their risk profile through the QCAP and qualify for better insurance coverage. Since the QCAP offers a stronger understanding of clients’ risk profiles, our underwriters are able to leverage this data and offer coverage that responds and improves as clients improve their risk posture.

You might also like

What the Collins Aerospace outage reveals about vendor risk

On September 19, 2025, chaos erupted at airports across Europe—but not because of weather, strikes, or mechanical failures. Collins Aerospace’s MUSE platform, the digital backbone handling passenger check-in and baggage processing from Heathrow to Dublin, went dark after a ransomware attack. Within hours, major airports including Brussels, Berlin, and Dublin were forced to revert to […]

Does Resilience use your company data to train AI?

In an era where “AI training” has become synonymous with data collection, we get this question a lot: “Does Resilience use our company data to train AI models like ChatGPT?” The short answer? No. But the full answer reveals something more interesting about how we approach cyber risk modeling and why we chose a different […]

New insights on the evolving threat landscape, from our 2025 Midyear Cyber Risk Report 

The cybersecurity world is experiencing an unexpected paradox in 2025. While cyber insurance claims in the Resilience portfolio dropped by 53% in the first half of the year—suggesting that organizations are getting better at preventing attacks—the financial damage from successful incidents has actually increased. Our latest 2025 Midyear Cyber Risk Report reveals that when cybercriminals […]

The seven places you should be looking when building your vendor list

In our first post, we established why comprehensive vendor discovery matters and how most organizations approach it incorrectly. Today, we’re diving into the practical mechanics: the seven data streams that can reveal vendor relationships hiding in your existing systems. The key insight is to start with data you already have rather than surveys or questionnaires. […]

How to get people to care about security when they don’t report to you

Getting executive sign-off on a new control? Hard. Getting peer buy-in on security initiatives when they don’t report to you? Harder. In modern organizations, cybersecurity professionals often find themselves in the ultimate matrix of organizational challenges: you need buy-in from every department within the organization – operations, sales, HR, and finance – but none of […]

Why vendor discovery matters now (and how most organizations get it wrong)

The average enterprise relies on hundreds—sometimes thousands—of third-party vendors to operate. Yet when security leaders are asked for a complete inventory of these vendors, the response is often a patchwork of spreadsheets, outdated procurement lists, and educated guesses. This vendor blindness isn’t just an operational inconvenience—it’s a critical business risk that’s becoming increasingly expensive to […]