Threatonomics

The Value of Risk-Driven Compliance

A Risk-First Approach to Following Cyber Regulations

by Rob Brown , Sr Director of Cyber Resilience
Published

Cyber risk is too complex to manage exclusively through compliance. While being compliant strengthens your security infrastructure, only implementing the legally required baseline of security or insurance is ultimately ineffective in managing cyber risk.

Solely filling legal requirements is what Resilience security and insurance experts call compliance-driven risk. Though technically acceptable, a compliance-driven mindset leaves gaps in your organization’s security infrastructure. These gaps can lead to costly breaches that far exceed the price of legal fines, controls that fail to consider the changing nature of cyber risk and an overall cyber security risk management strategy that does not align with long-term business goals.

At Resilience, we recommend a new approach: risk-driven compliance. Instead of only putting resources into what you need to be legally compliant, focus your energy and investments on what kind of coverage and security tools you will need to mitigate risks at the source. This approach is less of a set of guidelines and more of a mindset shift that organizations must adopt to build a cyber-resilient environment.

The Cost of Compliance

The cost of breaching compliance standards in security or insurance varies significantly from case to case, ranging from hundreds of thousands to hundreds of millions of dollars. However, the price of being vulnerable to cyber incidents is often much higher than these fines. According to IBM, the average cost of an incident in 2023 in the US is $4.45 million. This price tag can include the cost of extortion, reputational damage, business interruption, and more.

Legal compliance measures offer security and insurance baselines that don’t address the intricacies of all the costs associated with an incident. Every organization is unique and faces a different risk level, requiring an individualized mitigation strategy. Though it may say so on paper, being compliant is not the same as being secure.

A risk-driven compliance strategy will look at the most relevant risks to an organization and what is needed to manage these risks, whether that is more insurance or specific cybersecurity protocols. This approach is not only risk first but business first, as it leverages risk mitigation and transfer to support business growth, operations, and goals. “Risk-driven organizations understand that building cyber resilience is their top priority,” said Travis Wong, VP of Customer Engagement at Resilience. “Once cyber resilience objectives have been met, compliance will inherently follow.”

Want to learn how to measure what matters on the new frontier of risk management? Check out our podcast.

Putting Your Risk First is Putting Your Business First

It is not only a better risk management practice but also more economically efficient to use technology and security to support your overall business goals. Say you have a small company that sells widgets. You currently have minimal digital exposure but plan to introduce eCommerce. Instead of only thinking about your cyber infrastructure today, risk-driven compliance recommends investing in the infrastructure you are building towards.

For example, introducing an eCommerce capability will require following Payment Card Industry (PCI) standards. Failing to meet these standards can lead to fines of up to $500,000 per incident. A risk-driven compliance mindset will prepare for this larger exposure to risk by anticipating the potential impact of future business growth.

A risk-driven approach requires forward thinking while working backward, starting by identifying the biggest threats to your business goals and ending with how the mitigations align with legal requirements. This strategy allows your organization’s exposure to grow in line with digital trends without becoming vulnerable or standing out among industry peers as a target.

A Continuous Approach to Cybersecurity Risk Management

Legal frameworks are updated at a snail’s pace, while the world of cyber risk is dynamic, constantly evolving with new threats, tactics, and technologies. Compliance does its best to consider these factors; however, risk evolves much faster than the legal implementation of security strategies ever could. It stands to reason that following an annual compliance audit approach to security leaves your organization out of touch with dynamic risks. Nor does it anticipate new business challenges and opportunities.

Empowering Businesses with Risk-Driven Cyber Security Risk Management Approach

Risk-driven compliance is a mindset that supports Resilience’s continuous approach to risk management. At Resilience, rather than offering static cyber insurance policies and status quo security tools, we work closely with our clients to gain an in-depth understanding of their unique cyber risk, the threats that matter most to them, and the security tools that will have the most substantial return on investment (ROI).

We use our capabilities to leverage improved risk profiles and help our clients ultimately qualify for stronger insurance coverage. Building a business that can withstand an incident without impacting what matters most: your ability to deliver value to your customers.

With cyber attacks becoming increasingly sophisticated and common, businesses must prioritize comprehensive cyber security risk management. Resilience takes a bespoke approach, working with clients to understand their unique risks and provide tailored solutions. Request a demo of Resilience today to learn more about how we can help your business.

You might also like

The 65% shift that proves ransomware as we know it is dead

The cybersecurity industry has a terminology problem. We’re still calling it “ransomware” when the majority of attacks no longer encrypt and request a ransom for decryption as their primary weapon. Resilience’s analysis of cyber extortion claims in our portfolio throughout 2025 reveals a dramatic acceleration in attack methods. Data theft extortion-only events rose from 49% […]

Why your enterprise risk framework needs threat intelligence

Here’s a question that should make any enterprise risk management (ERM) professional uncomfortable: How can you manage a risk you don’t even know exists? In my role leading threat intelligence at Resilience, I work at the intersection of cybersecurity and business risk. And I’ve noticed a persistent gap: many ERM professionals know cyber risk belongs […]

Your 90-day roadmap to sustainable vendor risk management

We’ve covered why vendor discovery matters, how to mine data streams for comprehensive vendor identification, which vendor categories are commonly overlooked, and how to implement risk-based tiering. Now comes the critical question: how do you actually implement this in your organization and make it sustainable over time? Chuck Norton from Resilience emphasizes the resource reality: […]

How our 2025 cybersecurity predictions held up

At the start of 2025, we made some bold predictions about the cyber landscape. Now, as we look back at the year that was, it’s time to see how accurate our crystal ball really was. Dr. Ann Irvine, Chief Data and Analytics Officer at Resilience, sat down with us to evaluate what happened—and what surprised […]

Cybersecurity and insurance predictions for 2026

The cyber threat landscape is evolving at breakneck speed, and the challenges organizations will face in 2026 look dramatically different from those of even a year ago. To understand what’s coming, we gathered insights from Resilience’s leading cybersecurity and cyber insurance experts: Dr. Ann Irvine, Chief Data and Analytics Officer; Chris Wheeler, CISO; David Meese, […]

Risk-based vendor tiering that actually works

Welcome back to the Resilience third-party management series. In our first three posts, we covered why third-party vendor discovery matters, how to locate vendors across your environment, and which high-risk vendor categories most organizations overlook. Now we turn to the next step: prioritizing those vendors based on actual cyber risk—not contract spend. Most vendor management […]