Threatonomics

A CISO’s guide to winning the annual budgeting battle

by Emma McGowan , Senior Writer
Published

It’s that time of year again. Finance has sent the email with the budget template attached. Your CFO wants preliminary numbers by next week. And you’re staring at a spreadsheet wondering how to justify the security investments your organization desperately needs when last quarter’s board meeting included the phrase “do more with less.”

Welcome to budget season—the annual gauntlet that separates CISOs who get their security programs funded from those who spend another year making do with insufficient resources.

The predictable problems every CISO faces

The technical translation gap

You know exactly what your organization needs: enhanced endpoint detection, zero-trust architecture, a proper security operations center. But when you walk into that budget meeting and start talking about EDR capabilities and SIEM integration, you watch executive eyes glaze over. They’re not dismissing security—they genuinely don’t understand how these technical investments connect to business outcomes they care about.

The compliance trap

It’s tempting to lead with regulatory requirements. “We need this for SOC 2” or “This is required for GDPR compliance.” But compliance-driven budgets are the first to get cut when finances tighten. Executives view compliance as a cost of doing business, not a strategic investment. Unless you can connect those compliance requirements to revenue enablement or market access, you’re fighting an uphill battle.

The fear factor backfire

You’ve seen the headlines about massive breaches and ransomware attacks. You’re tempted to lead with fear: “If we don’t invest in security, we could be the next Colonial Pipeline.” But fear-based arguments often backfire. Executives become desensitized to threat warnings, and worse, positioning security as purely defensive makes you look like a cost center rather than a business enabler.

The metrics problem

Your CFO lives and breathes ROI calculations, payback periods, and cost-benefit analyses. They want to see numbers that prove your security investments will deliver measurable returns. But how do you calculate ROI on something that prevents incidents that might never happen? This quantification challenge leaves many CISOs struggling to compete with other departments that can show clear financial returns.

The priority paradox

You have a dozen critical security gaps, but you can’t ask for everything at once without looking unrealistic. Yet when you prioritize and present just your top three initiatives, stakeholders question whether security is really that important if you’re only asking for a few things. You’re damned if you ask for too much and questioned if you ask for too little.

The dreaded budget defense

Getting your initial budget request submitted is only half the battle. The real test comes when you’re defending those numbers in front of financial decision-makers. This is where many CISOs stumble—not because their requests are unreasonable, but because they haven’t done the prepwork for approval.

Under pressure, many CISOs retreat into technical explanations about attack vectors and security architectures when executives want to understand business impact and ROI. Others struggle to defend their numbers when priorities shift or when someone asks why their request exceeds industry benchmarks. The underlying problem is usually the same: without a consistent, documented methodology for quantifying risk and calculating returns, you can’t credibly defend your budget or adapt it when circumstances change. This lack of confidence shows, and it undermines your credibility as a strategic leader.

The risk-first approach changes everything

The fundamental problem isn’t that executives don’t care about security. They do. The problem is that most budget requests speak in security language instead of business language. They focus on controls and compliance instead of risk reduction and value protection.

A risk-first approach flips this dynamic. Instead of leading with the tools you need, you lead with the quantified business risks you’re addressing. Instead of asking for a budget based on compliance requirements, you demonstrate ROI based on expected annual loss and cost trade-off calculations. Instead of positioning security as a cost center, you show how security investments protect revenue, optimize costs, improve capital efficiency, and preserve treasury integrity—the four business objectives every CFO cares about.

When you can walk into a budget meeting and say “I’m requesting $1.2M annually for the next three years to protect $3.8M in identified annual risk exposure. This translates to a nominal 2.2:1 ROI,” you’re speaking their language. When you can show exactly how ransomware impacts revenue per hour of downtime using their own financial metrics, you’re demonstrating business acumen. When you can map your security investments to strategic business priorities they’ve already approved, you’re positioning yourself as a partner, not a supplicant.

This isn’t about manipulating numbers or overselling security’s value. It’s about translating legitimate security needs into the financial and strategic framework executives use to make all investment decisions. It’s about bringing the same analytical rigor to security investments that your organization applies to any other capital allocation decision.

Your toolkit for budget season success

Budget season doesn’t have to be an annual battle you barely survive. With the right approach and resources, you can transform it into an opportunity to strengthen your position as a trusted business partner who delivers measurable value.

That’s why we created our budgeting toolkit for risk-first CISOs. It includes expert-led webinars and actionable tips for how to get your budget passed–on the first try.

The difference between CISOs who consistently secure funding and those who struggle year after year isn’t technical expertise. It’s the ability to translate security investments into business value using the same language and metrics that drive all strategic decisions in your organization.

Your peers are already preparing their budget requests. Make sure yours stands out for the right reasons.

You might also like

What business leaders need to know about post-quantum cyber risk

Quantum computing is on the horizon and with it comes a seismic shift in how organizations must think about cybersecurity risk. The ability of future quantum machines to break today’s cryptographic protections–what we call quantum decryption–could undermine the trust, confidentiality, and resilience of digital business.                                                                                          As part of Cybersecurity Awareness Month, throughout October we are […]

The false promise of paying criminals to delete your data

On October 6, 2025, hackers demanded ransom from Salesforce for nearly one billion stolen customer records. The company’s response was unequivocal: no payment, no negotiation. While the refusal made headlines, the more important question is why Salesforce—and increasingly, other mature organizations—are walking away from the table when criminals offer to “suppress” stolen data. The answer […]

How brokers and CISOs can lead the charge for Cybersecurity Awareness Month 2025

October is Cybersecurity Awareness Month, and this year’s theme—”Building a Cyber Strong America“—has never been more relevant. For over two decades, this initiative led by CISA and the National Cybersecurity Alliance has spotlighted the importance of taking daily action to reduce online risks. In 2025, the focus shifts to the government entities and small-to-medium businesses […]

What the Collins Aerospace outage reveals about vendor risk

On September 19, 2025, chaos erupted at airports across Europe—but not because of weather, strikes, or mechanical failures. Collins Aerospace’s MUSE platform, the digital backbone handling passenger check-in and baggage processing from Heathrow to Dublin, went dark after a ransomware attack. Within hours, major airports including Brussels, Berlin, and Dublin were forced to revert to […]

Does Resilience use your company data to train AI?

In an era where “AI training” has become synonymous with data collection, we get this question a lot: “Does Resilience use our company data to train AI models like ChatGPT?” The short answer? No. But the full answer reveals something more interesting about how we approach cyber risk modeling and why we chose a different […]

New insights on the evolving threat landscape, from our 2025 Midyear Cyber Risk Report 

The cybersecurity world is experiencing an unexpected paradox in 2025. While cyber insurance claims in the Resilience portfolio dropped by 53% in the first half of the year—suggesting that organizations are getting better at preventing attacks—the financial damage from successful incidents has actually increased. Our latest 2025 Midyear Cyber Risk Report reveals that when cybercriminals […]